
Close contacts, defined as interatomic separations less than the sum of the respective van der Waals radii, are commonly invoked to identify attractive nonbonded interactions in crystal lattices. While this is often effective, it can also be misleading because (a) there are significant uncertainties associated with van der Waals radii, and (b) it may not be valid to attribute the interactions solely to specific pairs of atoms. The interactions within crystal lattices are Coulombic, and the strongest positive and/or negative regions do not always correspond to the positions of atoms; they are sometimes located between atoms. Examples of both types are given and discussed, focusing in particular upon σ-hole interactions.
SURFACE ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIALS; NONBONDED ATOMIC CONTACTS; SIGMA-HOLE INTERACTIONS; INTERMOLECULAR INTERACTIONS; DIRECTIONAL PREFERENCES; ADDITION COMPOUND; DIVALENT SULFUR; HALOGEN; MOLECULES; ACCEPTOR
SURFACE ELECTROSTATIC POTENTIALS; NONBONDED ATOMIC CONTACTS; SIGMA-HOLE INTERACTIONS; INTERMOLECULAR INTERACTIONS; DIRECTIONAL PREFERENCES; ADDITION COMPOUND; DIVALENT SULFUR; HALOGEN; MOLECULES; ACCEPTOR
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 63 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
