Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ I.R. "OLYMPIAS"arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
I.R. "OLYMPIAS"
Article . 2003
Data sources: I.R. "OLYMPIAS"
Chemistry Education Research and Practice
Article . 2003 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

CHEMICAL PHENOMENA VERSUS CHEMICAL REACTIONS: DO STUDENTS MAKE THE CONNECTION?

Authors: Tsaparlis, G.;

CHEMICAL PHENOMENA VERSUS CHEMICAL REACTIONS: DO STUDENTS MAKE THE CONNECTION?

Abstract

In this work, we examine whether tenth-grade high school students (N = 197, age 15- 16) as well as first-year university chemistry students (N = 77, age 18-19) can make the connection between chemical reactions and chemical phenomena. We used nineteen physical and chemical phenomena, and asked the students at one stage to distinguish physical from chemical phenomena, and at another stage to state in which cases one or more reactions occur. Students can be categorised into two distinct groups. One group includes those who do not always identify chemical phenomena with reaction(s), while the other group includes those who are successful in that distinction. Further, the students of the first group can be divided into two subgroups: (a) those who perform better in identifying the chemical phenomena; (b) those who perform better in identifying the reactions. A differentiation of chemical changes into natural and man-caused processes seems to be operating, at least with Greek students. On the other hand, students may be intuitively viewing chemical reactions as fairly simple processes, which can be expressed by means of chemical equations. Finally, it might be preferable to group (i) changes of physical state and phase, and (ii) solutions, in a separate category (physicochemical changes). [Chem. Educ. Res. Pract.: 2003, 4, 31-43]

Related Organizations
Keywords

chemistry/science education programmes of study, Greece, physical phenomena/changes/processes, chemical reactions, studentsΓ­ conceptions, chemical phenomena/changes/processes, misconceptions

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
16
Average
Top 10%
Average
Green
Beta
sdg_colorsSDGs:
Related to Research communities