
Sampling can be the source of the greatest errors in the overall results of foliar analysis. This paper reviews the variability in heavy metal concentrations in tree crowns, which is a feature that should be known and understood when designing a suitable leaf sampling procedure. The leaf sampling procedures applied in 75 articles were examined. Most of the environmental studies used a closely related form of the UN/ECE-EC leaf sampling procedure, which was developed for the long-term monitoring of forest condition. Studies with objectives outside the UN/ECE-EC field of application should utilize a sampling procedure that is in accordance with the objectives of the study and based on the observed variation in pilot and similar studies. The inherent sources of heavy metal variability inside the stand, i.e. the crown class, stand management, site properties, crown dimensions, infections, seasons, etc. were discussed, but the underlying causes of this variability are rarely understood. The inherent variability in tree crowns is the reason for using leaf sampling as a tool in pollution studies. The objectives of a pollution study determine which sources of variability are utilized by the researcher.
REFUSE INCINERATOR, COPPER, CHEMICAL COMPOSITION, Specimen Handling, Trees, Metals, Heavy, SEASONAL VARIATION, NUTRIENT STATUS, otanta, HEAVY METAL, lehtipuut, SITE INDEX, Reproducibility of Results, neulasanalyysi, sampling procedure, Plant Leaves, AIR POLLUTION, foliar analysis, Environmental Pollutants, Seasons, PLANT MATRICES, SMELTER, deciduous tree, Environmental Monitoring
REFUSE INCINERATOR, COPPER, CHEMICAL COMPOSITION, Specimen Handling, Trees, Metals, Heavy, SEASONAL VARIATION, NUTRIENT STATUS, otanta, HEAVY METAL, lehtipuut, SITE INDEX, Reproducibility of Results, neulasanalyysi, sampling procedure, Plant Leaves, AIR POLLUTION, foliar analysis, Environmental Pollutants, Seasons, PLANT MATRICES, SMELTER, deciduous tree, Environmental Monitoring
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
