
AbstractThree genotypes of alfalfa viz. Medicago sativa (Zhongmu No. 1, Zhongmu No. 2) and M. varia (Caoyuan No. 3) grown in the filed were investigated for the contribution of pod wall and leaves by shading all pods and leaves on July 15, 20 and 25, respectively. Date was recorded for total pod weight (TPW), pod wall weight (PWW), seed weight per pod (SWP), seed number per pod (SNP) and single seed weight (SSW) of one-coil and two-coil spiral pods. TPW, SNP, PWW and SWP were reduced by shading all leaves or pods, whereas SSW was not significantly affected. The relative photosynthetic contribution of pod wall to SWP was 25.6–48.1% in three genotypes on July 15. The pod wall in one-coil spiral pods generated a greater relative contribution to the TPW and SWP than in two-coil spiral pods. In the last stage (July 25), the relative photosynthetic contribution of leaves to SWP sharply decreased, whereas the relative photosynthetic contribution of pod wall to SWP was stable in the late stage (July 20 and 25). In conclusion, the pod wall of alfalfa could carry out photosynthesis and the pod wall played an important role in pod filling at the late growth stage.
Agricultural engineering, Life Sciences, Plant Science, Horticulture, Article, Agronomy, Genetic Diversity and Improvement of Soybean, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Engineering, Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in Legumes, Point of delivery, Intercropping in Agricultural Systems, Seed Composition, Agronomy and Crop Science, Biology
Agricultural engineering, Life Sciences, Plant Science, Horticulture, Article, Agronomy, Genetic Diversity and Improvement of Soybean, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Engineering, Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in Legumes, Point of delivery, Intercropping in Agricultural Systems, Seed Composition, Agronomy and Crop Science, Biology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 33 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
