
AbstractJudgements and decisions in many political, economic or medical contexts are often made while sleep deprived. Furthermore, in such contexts individuals are required to integrate information provided by – more or less qualified – advisors. We asked if sleep deprivation affects advice taking. We conducted a 2 (sleep deprivation: yes vs. no) ×2 (competency of advisor: medium vs. high) experimental study to examine the effects of sleep deprivation on advice taking in an estimation task. We compared participants with one night of total sleep deprivation to participants with a night of regular sleep. Competency of advisor was manipulated within subjects. We found that sleep deprived participants show increased advice taking. An interaction of condition and competency of advisor and further post-hoc analyses revealed that this effect was more pronounced for the medium competency advisor compared to the high competency advisor. Furthermore, sleep deprived participants benefited more from an advisor of high competency in terms of stronger improvement in judgmental accuracy than well-rested participants.
Adult, Male, advice taking, 330, Teaching, Decision Making, 150, sleep deprivation, Article, Radboudumc 13: Stress-related disorders DCMN: Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience, Judgment, Young Adult, Cognition, 130 000 Cognitive Neurology & Memory, Humans, Learning, Sleep Deprivation, Attention, Female
Adult, Male, advice taking, 330, Teaching, Decision Making, 150, sleep deprivation, Article, Radboudumc 13: Stress-related disorders DCMN: Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience, Judgment, Young Adult, Cognition, 130 000 Cognitive Neurology & Memory, Humans, Learning, Sleep Deprivation, Attention, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
