
AbstractCooperative decision rules have so far been shown experimentally mainly in mammal species that have variable and complex social networks. However, these traits should not necessarily be restricted to mammals. Therefore, we tested cooperative problem solving in ravens. We showed that, without training, nine ravens spontaneously cooperated in a loose-string task. Corroborating findings in several species, ravens’ cooperative success increased with increasing inter-individual tolerance levels. Importantly, we found this in both a forced dyadic setting and in a group setting where individuals had an open choice to cooperate with whomever. The ravens, moreover, also paid attention to the resulting reward distribution and ceased cooperation when being cheated upon. Nevertheless, the ravens did not seem to pay attention to the behavior of their partners while cooperating and future research should reveal whether this is task specific or a general pattern. Given their natural propensity to cooperate and the results we present here, we consider ravens as an interesting model species to study the evolution of and the mechanisms underlying cooperation.
Male, Behavioural ecology, INTELLIGENCE, CEBUS-APELLA, 106051 Verhaltensbiologie, CHIMPANZEES, Article, Reward, Animals, Interpersonal Relations, Cooperative Behavior, Problem Solving, Crows, Social evolution, Behavior, Animal, RECIPROCAL ALTRUISM, ANIMALS, COMMON RAVENS, Animal behaviour, 106051 Behavioural biology, CAPUCHIN MONKEYS, TASK, COGNITION, Female, BEHAVIOR
Male, Behavioural ecology, INTELLIGENCE, CEBUS-APELLA, 106051 Verhaltensbiologie, CHIMPANZEES, Article, Reward, Animals, Interpersonal Relations, Cooperative Behavior, Problem Solving, Crows, Social evolution, Behavior, Animal, RECIPROCAL ALTRUISM, ANIMALS, COMMON RAVENS, Animal behaviour, 106051 Behavioural biology, CAPUCHIN MONKEYS, TASK, COGNITION, Female, BEHAVIOR
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 105 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
