
pmid: 30215392
Objectives: This study investigated general dental practitioners' (GDPs) understanding and perceptions of minimally invasive dentistry (MID). This questionnaire-based survey looked at GDPs currently practising in the UK. / Methods: A total of 170 questionnaires were distributed. The questionnaire enquired about demographic information, postgraduate training in MID, number of years in clinical practice, the working environment, perceptions of the methods and rationale for their choice of restorative materials in clinical practice, and tested their knowledge of MID. / Results: Of the 170 distributed questionnaires, 87.6% (N = 149) were completed. The results showed that only 28% of the respondents scored all the basic MID knowledge questions correctly, illustrating a general lack of basic contemporary understanding of MID among the GDPs. Logistic regression analysis of the data revealed a true correlation between the knowledge in MID and the perception of knowing. The analysis also showed that knowledge in MID, application of G. V. Black's concepts and change in MID approach since qualification were significant (p <0.05). There were no significant relationships between the knowledge score on studied scenarios and country of education, working environment, caries risk assessment, effect of caries risk assessment on treatment planning, effect of caries risk assessment on choice of restorative material, dietary assessment and fluoride usage. / Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the knowledge of MID among UK GDPs is generally poor. There is a need for further education in the field of MID.
Adult, Male, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, health knowledge, attitudes, practice, Attitude of Health Personnel, Dentists, cross-sectional studies, Pilot Projects, Dental Caries, dentistry/statistics and numerical data, Risk Assessment, regression analysis, Statistics, Nonparametric, male, Dentistry, Operative, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, humans, dental caries/ therapy, chi-square distribution, Chi-Square Distribution, statistics, nonparametric, adult, dentists/psychology, risk assessment, pilot projects, United Kingdom, female, multivariate analysis, /dk/atira/pure/core/subjects/dentistry, Cross-Sectional Studies, dentistry, operative/statistics & numerical data, Dentistry, surveys and questionnaires, Multivariate Analysis, General Practice, Dental, young adult, Regression Analysis, Female, attitude of health personnel
Adult, Male, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, health knowledge, attitudes, practice, Attitude of Health Personnel, Dentists, cross-sectional studies, Pilot Projects, Dental Caries, dentistry/statistics and numerical data, Risk Assessment, regression analysis, Statistics, Nonparametric, male, Dentistry, Operative, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, humans, dental caries/ therapy, chi-square distribution, Chi-Square Distribution, statistics, nonparametric, adult, dentists/psychology, risk assessment, pilot projects, United Kingdom, female, multivariate analysis, /dk/atira/pure/core/subjects/dentistry, Cross-Sectional Studies, dentistry, operative/statistics & numerical data, Dentistry, surveys and questionnaires, Multivariate Analysis, General Practice, Dental, young adult, Regression Analysis, Female, attitude of health personnel
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
