
doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.168
pmid: 19543215
Social networks theory suggests obesity is “contagious” within peer groups in that known friends highly influence weight. On the other hand, an alternative model suggests that observable weight distributions affect perception of one's own obesity level. We examine whether the BMI levels of the most obese classmates in the individual student's grade by gender is positively associated with “under‐assessment” of obesity and overweight (i.e., independently measured obesity or overweight, but subjective self‐assessment of normal weight). The data are the 2004–2005 School Physical Activity and Nutrition III (SPAN), a stratified, multistage probability sample of 4th, 8th, and 11th grade public school children in Texas. We used logistic regression to test whether the gender‐specific 85th percentile BMI level within the individual student's grade at their school is positively associated with “under‐assessment” of obesity and overweight. The results show that students are much more likely to under‐assess their own weight if the gender‐specific 85th percentile BMI level is higher in their grade at their school. These data suggest that observable weight distributions play a key role in the obesity epidemic.
Male, Schools, Adolescent, Body Weight, Age Factors, Overweight, Texas, Peer Group, Self Concept, Body Mass Index, Sex Factors, Population Surveillance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Body Image, Humans, Regression Analysis, Female, Obesity, Child, Students
Male, Schools, Adolescent, Body Weight, Age Factors, Overweight, Texas, Peer Group, Self Concept, Body Mass Index, Sex Factors, Population Surveillance, Surveys and Questionnaires, Body Image, Humans, Regression Analysis, Female, Obesity, Child, Students
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
