Science communication reconsidered
Copyright policy )WT| unidentified
Bubela, Tania M.; Nisbet, Matthew C.; Borchelt, Rick; Brunger, Fern; Critchley, Christine; Einsiedel, Edna F.; Geller, Gail; +17 Authors
Bubela, Tania M.; Nisbet, Matthew C.; Borchelt, Rick; Brunger, Fern; Critchley, Christine; Einsiedel, Edna F.; Geller, Gail; Gupta, Anil; Hampel, Jurgen; Hyde-Lay, Robyn; Jandciu, Eric W.; Jones, S. Ashley; Kolopack, Pam; Lane, Summer; Lougheed, Tim; Nerlich, Brigitte; Ogbogu, Ubaka; O'Riordan, Kathleen; Ouellette, Colin; Spear, Mike; Strauss, Stephen; Thavaratnam, Thushaanthini; Willemse, Lisa; Caulfield, Timothy A.;
Science communication reconsidered
As new media proliferate and the public's trust and engagement in science are influenced by industry involvement in academic research, an interdisciplinary workshop provides some recommendations to enhance science communication.
- University of Washington United States
- University of Sussex United Kingdom
- University of Toronto Canada
- University of Stuttgart Germany
- Lancaster University United Kingdom
Marketing, Professional Role, Communication, Communications Media, Journalism, Public Opinion, Science, Public Policy
Marketing, Professional Role, Communication, Communications Media, Journalism, Public Opinion, Science, Public Policy
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).329 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1% influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Top 1% impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Top 1%
selected citations
Citations provided by BIP!
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
Citations provided by BIP!popularityPopularity provided by BIP!
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
Popularity provided by BIP! 329
Top 1%
Top 1%
Top 1%
This action will publish the selected files and record in Zenodo. Are you sure you want to proceed?