Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Eyearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Eye
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Eye
Article . 2008 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Posterior vitreous detachment following cataract surgery

Authors: D, Hilford; M, Hilford; A, Mathew; P J, Polkinghorne;

Posterior vitreous detachment following cataract surgery

Abstract

To determine the incidence of posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) in a series of patients who have undergone cataract surgery by phacoemulsification.Comparative case series.A consecutive series of 149 patients who underwent cataract surgery aged between 50 and 60 years were evaluated in this study.Patients identified as being eligible for this study were recalled for an ophthalmic assessment, which included a dilated retinal examination.The status of the vitreous was recorded following an evaluation by slit-lamp biomicroscopy, binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy, and B-scan ultrasonography.A PVD was documented in 50.8% of the pseudophakic eyes as compared to 20.8% in the phakic fellow eyes. This difference was statistically significant. Furthermore, the incidence of PVD was greater in pseudophakic eyes with an axial length of 25 mm or greater compared to those eyes with an axial length of <25 mm. Neodymium: yttrium garnet (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy did not influence the prevalence of PVD.In this series of eyes, with a median follow-up interval of 77 months the incidence of pseudophakic retinal detachment (PRD) was 4%.The incidence of PVD in pseudophakic eyes in the 6th decade is higher than those phakic eyes, and is likely to be associated with the increased risk of PRD observed in this age group.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Phacoemulsification, Pseudophakia, Incidence, Microscopy, Acoustic, Middle Aged, Vitreous Detachment, Cohort Studies, Vitreous Body, Postoperative Complications, Risk Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Humans, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    69
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
69
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze