
doi: 10.1038/244371a0
IT is often proposed by taxonomists and ecologists that classifications and other related analyses should be based on the possible largest number of characters. They believe that when large character sets are used the analysis will gain in accuracy, and the results will be more broadly applicable. Yet sampling, computational and other logistic problems are often associated with the handling of large character sets. Some characters may have to be deleted in the interest of more economical sampling and computations.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
