
doi: 10.1038/216360a0
IN 1929, Watson1 pointed out that very close to the surface of the Earth the atmospheric electric current, in normal fine weather field, is carried only by positive ions, so that the current density can be computed from where J is the density of the current from ionosphere to Earth, Es is the electric field at the surface, and λ+s is the conductivity of the air at the surface due to positive ions. The electric field and the conductivity, however, are measured usually at a height of approximately 1 metre. The density of the current due to conductivity, Jc(1), at this height is whereE(1) is the electric field at 1 metre and λ±(1) is the conductivity due to positive and negative ions at 1 metre. The diffusion current is usually neglected and it is assumed that the current density is approximately equal to the density of the conduction current at 1 metre, so that it can be computed from equation (2). This assumption is supported by the observations of Nolan2,3 and Hogg4. It will be shown here that this assumption is not correct and that the current density should be estimated from This statement can be proved by three arguments which will be discussed here shortly.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
