
doi: 10.1038/19443
The cleaning of client fish by cleaner fish is one of the most highly developed interspecific communication systems known. But even though it is a seemingly obvious mutualism1,2, several quantitative studies3,5 have failed to show any benefit for the clients, leading to the hypothesis that cleaner fish are ‘behavioural parasites’ that exploit the sensory system of the clients6 to obtain food, rather than to increase the client's fitness. The cleaner fish Labroides dimidiatus eats parasitic gnathiid isopods, which decline in number on the client fish Hemigymnus melapterus daily between dawn and sunset7,8. I find that the cleaner fish reduces parasite abundance, resulting in a 4.5-fold difference within 12 hours, supporting the hypothesis that cleaning behaviour is mutualistic.
Multidisciplinary Sciences, C1, 780105 Biological sciences, Science & Technology - Other Topics, 270702 Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology), 333
Multidisciplinary Sciences, C1, 780105 Biological sciences, Science & Technology - Other Topics, 270702 Marine and Estuarine Ecology (incl. Marine Ichthyology), 333
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 224 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
