
doi: 10.1038/157447b0
WE emphatically agree with most of the recent letter from Dr. Chapman and others1 on the need for the development of tropical ecological studies. Such studies are essential to the work of the practical applied scientist—the agriculturalist or forester—and also in the field of pure ecology. There are, however, a number of points which seem to be wrongly stressed, or left unmentioned. Dr. Chapman et al. themselves state that theoretical ecology is to-day to some extent based on unbalanced data, drawn from only a part of the world's vegetation. It is possible that much modification may be necessary to this theory as the details of vegetation in regions with predominantly phanerophytic floras become known.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
