Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Naturearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Nature
Article . 1929 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer Nature TDM
Data sources: Crossref
https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/123...
Article
Data sources: Microsoft Academic Graph
 View all 1 versions
Claim

Resistance of Wheat Varieties to Bunt (Tilletia caries)

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 16 Feb 1929 English Publisher:Springer Science and Business Media LLCJournal:Nature, volume 123, pages 243-243 (issn: 0028-0836, eissn: 1476-4687, Copyright policy )
Authors: W. A. R. DILLON WESTON;

doi: 10.1038/123243a0

Resistance of Wheat Varieties to Bunt (Tilletia caries)

Abstract

A VARIETY of wheat, Sherman (T. vulgare Vill.), stated to be resistant to bunt, has been grown at Cambridge for the past five seasons. It has been tested for resistance or susceptibility to the fungus Tilletia caries (DC.) Tul. (=T. tritici). (Bjerk.) (Wint.). It was previously tested in 1923 at Moro. Ore. U.S.A., by the Cereal Investigation Board. The percentage of bunt then obtained was 1.1. In 1924–1926 it was very heavily contaminated by me at the rate of one part of crushed bunt balls to 25 parts of wheat. At the 1925 harvest, the percentage of bunt present was 1.01, at the 1926 harvest 1.6. It thus seemed evident that Sherman was very highly resistant to the disease.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!
uploadUpload now