
doi: 10.1038/100186c0
MR. STREET is in error in attributing to me (NATURE, October 25, p. 145) the “contention that viscous action in a solid earth cannot be an appreciable cause of the slowing of its rotation.” I have never made any such assertion, it is opposed to my personal opinion, and in the present state of knowledge it is quite impossible either to affirm or to deny a statement of such definiteness. His criticisms of the law of viscosity used by me (M.N., R.A.S., vol. lxxvii., pp. 449–56) are confined to its precise mathematical form, to which I attach little importance, and do not touch the physical conceptions underlying it, which are fundamental. The mathematical argument was only a numerical illustration of the order of magnitude of the effects to be expected from these.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
