Downloads provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.1038/026574d0
IF the “singular fish of a deep black colour, with small eyes, and a most abyssal physiognomy,” noticed by Prof. Giglioli (NATURE, vol. xxv. p. 535) had been a Chiasmodon, that learned ichthyologist would doubtless have recognised it, and not suggested that “it may be allied to Malacosteus.” But in addition to the two specimens of Chiasmodon niger referred to by Mr. Johnson (NATURE, vol. xxvi. p. 453), it may interest ichthyologists to learn that a third specimen has been found off the New England coast (on the Le Have Bank). Like the others previously known it had engorged a fish several times larger than itself. The specimen is now in the U.S. National Museum. Chiasmodon, it may be added, is not at all related to the Gadidae, as has been supposed by Messrs. Gunther and Johnson, but is a true Acanthopterygian fish and the type of a peculiar family—the Chiasmodontidœ. [In Dr. Gunther's “system” it belongs to the heterogeneous family Trachinidœ.]
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts