Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Discriminant validity of the alternative model of personality disorder.

Authors: Gillian A. McCabe; Thomas A. Widiger;

Discriminant validity of the alternative model of personality disorder.

Abstract

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-5 Section III alternative model of personality disorder (AMPD) was developed to rectify some of the failings of the DSM-IV personality disorders, including a lack of compelling discriminant validity. The primary purpose of the current study was to provide a direct comparison of DSM-IV with DSM-5 Section III AMPD with respect to discriminant validity in a sample of 302 community members from the United States who were currently receiving or had received mental health treatment. The AMPD Criterion A, level of personality functioning, was assessed by the Section III Criterion A impairment scales (Anderson & Sellbom, 2018). AMPD Criterion B, the five-domain pathological trait model, was assessed by the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (Krueger, Derringer, Markon, Watson, & Skodol, 2012). Also included was the cross-cutting Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report (Morey, 2017). DSM-IV personality disorders were assessed by the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4 (Hyler, 1994) and the Multi-Source Assessment of Personality Pathology (Oltmanns & Turkheimer, 2006). Results demonstrate no substantive improvement in discriminant validity in the AMPD compared to the DSM-IV. Implications of these findings for the conceptualization and assessment of personality disorders are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Personality Inventory, Concept Formation, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Personality Disorders, Diagnosis, Differential, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Psychotherapy, Phenotype, Humans, Female, Self Report

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!