Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao BiPrintsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
BiPrints
Article . 2020
License: "In Copyright" Rights Statement
Data sources: BiPrints
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Publications at Bielefeld University
Article . 2020
License: "In Copyright" Rights Statement
Emotion
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
Emotion
Article . 2020
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

More efficient visual search for happy faces may not indicate guidance, but rather faster distractor rejection: Evidence from eye movements and fixations.

Authors: Gernot Horstmann; Stefanie I. Becker;

More efficient visual search for happy faces may not indicate guidance, but rather faster distractor rejection: Evidence from eye movements and fixations.

Abstract

The visual search paradigm has been used in emotion research to examine the relation between facial expressions of emotion and attention. Here, the better performance in a search for one facial expression category (e.g., a happy face) compared to a second category (e.g., an angry face) has been often interpreted as indicating better guidance of attention. Better guidance of attention in turn indicates that some aspect of the facial expression can be used preattentively, that is, while focused attention is directed elsewhere in the visual field. This view has been criticized because better performance may also mean better distractor rejection independently of guidance. The present study uses eye tracking to disentangle the two variables. The results show better search performance with a happy than angry face as the target. Facial emotion also influenced the time the eyes fixated a stimulus (dwelling), but not guidance related variables of search performance. A linear regression moreover showed that dwelling accounted for large amounts of variance in the overall search times. Overall, the results present clear-cut evidence that differential search performance does not need to indicate differential guidance, but may also be explained by postselective factors that influence the dwelling on stimuli. The broader implication of this demonstration is that results from the visual search paradigm have to be interpreted with caution, and that better search performance cannot be directly interpreted as an indicator of preattentive guidance of attention. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Countries
Germany, Australia, Germany
Keywords

Adult, Male, visual search, Eye Movements, Happiness, 150, emotion, Anger, attention, Facial Expression, faces, Face, Reaction Time, Humans, Attention, Female, Visual Fields, General Psychology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!