
doi: 10.1037/dev0000431
pmid: 29154642
In this longitudinal multiinformant study negative emotionality and sensory processing sensitivity were compared as susceptibility markers among kindergartners. Participating children (N = 264, 52.9% boys) were Dutch kindergartners (Mage = 4.77, SD = 0.60), followed across three waves, spaced seven months apart. Results show that associations between parenting and child behavior did not depend on children's negative emotionality. Sensory processing sensitivity, however, interacted with both (changes in) negative and (changes in) positive parenting in predicting externalizing, but not prosocial, behavior. Depending on the interaction, vantage sensitivity and differential susceptibility models were supported. The findings suggest that sensory processing sensitivity may be a more proximal correlate of individual differences in susceptibility, compared with negative emotionality. (PsycINFO Database Record
Adult, Male, Problem Behavior, Parenting, Sensory processing sensitivity, Emotions, Vantage sensitivity, Individuality, Child Behavior, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult, Child, Preschool, Differential susceptibility, Negative emotionality, Humans, Female, Perception, Longitudinal Studies, Child, Social Behavior, Follow-Up Studies
Adult, Male, Problem Behavior, Parenting, Sensory processing sensitivity, Emotions, Vantage sensitivity, Individuality, Child Behavior, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult, Child, Preschool, Differential susceptibility, Negative emotionality, Humans, Female, Perception, Longitudinal Studies, Child, Social Behavior, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 139 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
