Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) sonar: Ten predictions.

Authors: Eduardo Mercado;

Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) sonar: Ten predictions.

Abstract

Bats and dolphins echolocate ultrasonically while foraging, an active mode of perception that is effective for intercepting small, fast-moving targets, but less so for tracking large targets from long distances. Unlike toothed whales, humpback whales and other baleen whales are widely assumed not to echolocate. Echoes generated by humpback whale vocalizations often have been viewed either as low-level background noise that minimally affects acoustic communication between whales or as indirect cues to large environmental features. An additional possibility is that vocalizing humpback whales (and perhaps other whales) produce sonic sounds to actively generate echoes that they localize and interpret. Animals attempting to echolocate using lower frequency sounds underwater face some of the same signal processing challenges faced by ultrasonic echolocators, as well as some unique challenges. The extent to which listening whales can meet these challenges largely determines what they can actively perceive by monitoring self-generated echoes. In the absence of psychophysical experiments with baleen whales, comparisons with auditory processing by echolocating species provide the best indications of what humpback whales may echoically perceive. Empirical tests of key predictions derived from the hypothesis that humpback whales echolocate are also critical to understanding how they use sound. Recognizing that sonic echolocation by whales may differ substantially from ultrasonic echolocation in smaller species is an important step toward clarifying the role that active auditory perception plays in whale behavior. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Keywords

Echolocation, Auditory Perception, Animals, Acoustics, Vocalization, Animal, Humpback Whale

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!