
doi: 10.1037/a0028520
pmid: 22612169
The present study sheds light on the interplay between lexical and decision processes in the lexical decision task by exploring the effects of lexical decision difficulty on semantic priming effects. In 2 experiments, we increased lexical decision difficulty by either using transposed letter wordlike nonword distracters (e.g., JUGDE; Experiment 1) or by visually degrading targets (Experiment 2). Although target latencies were considerably slowed by both difficulty manipulations, stimulus quality-but not nonword type-moderated priming effects, consistent with recent work by Lupker and Pexman (2010). To characterize these results in a more fine-grained manner, data were also analyzed at the level of response time (RT) distributions, using a combination of ex-Gaussian, quantile, and diffusion model analyses. The results indicate that for clear targets, priming was reflected by distributional shifting of comparable magnitude across different nonword types. In contrast, priming of degraded targets was reflected by shifting and an increase in the tail of the distribution. We discuss how these findings, along with others, can be accommodated by an embellished multistage activation model that incorporates retrospective prime retrieval and decision-based mechanisms.
Male, Likelihood Functions, Universities, Diffusion model, Ex-Gaussian analysis, Decision Making, 150, Neuropsychological Tests, Vocabulary, Response time distributional analyses, Semantics, Lexical decision tasks, Repetition Priming, Reaction Time, Humans, Attention, Female, Visual word recognition, Students, Semantic priming, Photic Stimulation
Male, Likelihood Functions, Universities, Diffusion model, Ex-Gaussian analysis, Decision Making, 150, Neuropsychological Tests, Vocabulary, Response time distributional analyses, Semantics, Lexical decision tasks, Repetition Priming, Reaction Time, Humans, Attention, Female, Visual word recognition, Students, Semantic priming, Photic Stimulation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
