
Two issues pertinent to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5) proposal for personality pathology, the recovery of DSM-IV personality disorders (PDs) by proposed DSM-5 traits and the validity of the proposed DSM-5 hybrid model, which incorporates both personality pathology symptoms and maladaptive traits, were evaluated in a large undergraduate sample (N = 808). Proposed DSM-5 traits as assessed with the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 explained a substantial proportion of variance in DSM-IV PDs as assessed with the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+, and trait indicators of the 6 proposed DSM-5 PDs were mostly specific to those disorders with some exceptions. Regression analyses support the DSM-5 hybrid model in that pathological traits, and an indicator of general personality pathology severity provided incremental information about PDs. Findings are discussed in the context of broader issues around the proposed DSM-5 model of personality disorders.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, 10093 Institute of Psychology, Reproducibility of Results, Personality Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 2738 Psychiatry and Mental Health, Young Adult, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Self Report, 150 Psychology, 2803 Biological Psychiatry, Biological Psychiatry
Adult, Male, Adolescent, 10093 Institute of Psychology, Reproducibility of Results, Personality Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 2738 Psychiatry and Mental Health, Young Adult, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Self Report, 150 Psychology, 2803 Biological Psychiatry, Biological Psychiatry
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 271 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
