
In 3 experiments, subjects named pictures with low- or high-frequency superimposed distractor words. In a 1st experiment, we replicated the finding that low-frequency words induce more interference in picture naming than high-frequency words (i.e., distractor frequency effect; Miozzo & Caramazza, 2003). According to the response exclusion hypothesis, this effect has its origin at a postlexical stage and is related to a response buffer. The account predicts that the distractor frequency effect should only be present when a response to the word enters the response buffer. This was tested by masking the distractor (Experiment 2) and by presenting it at various time points before stimulus onset (Experiment 3). Results supported the hypothesis by showing that the effect was only present when distractors were visible, and if they were presented in close proximity to the target picture. These results have implications for the models of lexical access and for the tasks that can be used to study this process.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, COMPETITION, Field Dependence-Independence, Neuropsychological Tests, LANGUAGE PRODUCTION, Vocabulary, SPEECH PRODUCTION, Conflict, Psychological, Young Adult, SPREADING-ACTIVATION THEORY, Medicine and Health Sciences, Confidence Intervals, Reaction Time, Humans, Attention, SEMANTIC INTERFERENCE, FACILITATION, Semantics, CONTEXT, Pattern Recognition, Visual, TASK, Female, Perceptual Masking, LEMMA RETRIEVAL, Photic Stimulation, LEXICAL ACCESS
Adult, Male, Adolescent, COMPETITION, Field Dependence-Independence, Neuropsychological Tests, LANGUAGE PRODUCTION, Vocabulary, SPEECH PRODUCTION, Conflict, Psychological, Young Adult, SPREADING-ACTIVATION THEORY, Medicine and Health Sciences, Confidence Intervals, Reaction Time, Humans, Attention, SEMANTIC INTERFERENCE, FACILITATION, Semantics, CONTEXT, Pattern Recognition, Visual, TASK, Female, Perceptual Masking, LEMMA RETRIEVAL, Photic Stimulation, LEXICAL ACCESS
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 82 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
