
Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is more often diagnosed in women than in men, and symptoms tend to decline with age. Using a large community sample, the authors investigated whether sex and age differences in four main features of BPD, measured with the Personality Assessment Inventory-Borderline Features scale (PAI-BOR; Morey, 1991), are a result of measurement bias or if they represent true differences. The PAI-BOR was completed by four Sex x Age groups (N = 6,838). Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis showed that the PAI-BOR is measurement invariant across sex and age. Compared with men, women reported more borderline characteristics for affective instability, identity problems, and negative relationships but not for self-harm. Younger men had higher scores for identity problems and self-harm than did older men. Younger women had higher scores for identity problems and affective instability than did older women. Results suggest that the PAI-BOR can be used to study the etiology of BPD features in population-based samples and to screen for BPD features in clinical settings in both men and women of varying ages. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).
Netherlands Twin Register (NTR), Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, SDG 5 - Gender Equality, Adolescent, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Personality Assessment, Young Adult, Age Distribution, Borderline Personality Disorder, Humans, Female, Sex Distribution, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Aged, Netherlands
Netherlands Twin Register (NTR), Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, SDG 5 - Gender Equality, Adolescent, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Personality Assessment, Young Adult, Age Distribution, Borderline Personality Disorder, Humans, Female, Sex Distribution, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Aged, Netherlands
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 62 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
