
doi: 10.1029/2007jc004635
Recent publications have evaluated topostrophy, τ ≡ f × V · ∇D where is f Coriolis, V is velocity, and ∇D is gradient of total depth, as a means of comparing models' circulations. Some results are striking. Comparing four global models, two with modest grid size and two with fine grids, Merryfield and Scott (2007) show that finer grid models are characterized by more positive τ, especially at greater depths and higher latitudes. Among nine Arctic Ocean models, Holloway et al. (2007) find τ in three of the models quite distinct from the other six, a result shown to depend upon subgrid eddy parameterization. From different choices of numerical method within the same model, Penduff et al. (2007) show that improved numerical representations support more positive τ. Can these model results be compared with observations? A global compilation has been prepared from 17120 current meter records, spanning 83087 current meter‐months. The compilation tends to confirm modeling progress achieved by finer resolution, improved parameterizations and better representations. A new characterization of global ocean circulation emerges, with suggestive dynamical insights.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
