
doi: 10.1029/2000jb000035
handle: 1885/89464
A novel approach to hypocenter location is proposed on the basis the concept of pattern recognition. A new data misfit criterion for location is introduced which measures discrepancies between the observed arrival times of an event and those of “nearby” previous events. In the arrival pattern misfit measure, travel times predicted by an Earth model are effectively replaced by information from an ensemble of previous observations. Thin‐plate spline interpolation and generalized cross validation are applied to interpolate and smooth the resulting misfit function which may then be used in standard location algorithms. Synthetic experiments show that in certain circumstances, it is possible to achieve locations with errors smaller than those in the underlying database. It is suggested that the arrival pattern approach exploits information on lateral heterogeneous Earth structure contained in the database to constrain locations. The arrival pattern approach is illustrated by relocating 395 ground truth events from the Nevada Test Site, 482 earthquakes from the Marianas subduction zone, and 457 earthquakes from the Atlantic mid‐ocean ridge. It is shown that picking errors and unmodeled, small‐scale lateral heterogeneity are the most significant sources of event mislocation and that errors in the original locations of the database events make a much smaller contribution.
Teleseismic location, teleseismic wave Arrival pattern, Hypocenter determination, pattern recognition, seismic discrimination, Numerical techniques, nuclear weapons testing, Keywords: earthquake hypocenter, seismic source
Teleseismic location, teleseismic wave Arrival pattern, Hypocenter determination, pattern recognition, seismic discrimination, Numerical techniques, nuclear weapons testing, Keywords: earthquake hypocenter, seismic source
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
