
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>handle: 10419/24416
This paper discusses theoretically the different incentives of managers versus firm owners to invest in innovative activities. There are opposing effects concerning R&D intensity in the manager-controlled firm. Our study on the determinants of R&D intensity presents empirical results concerning this question. A sample of German firms with 3,978 observations is used and it turns out that the owner-led firms invest less into R&D than the managerial firms. With respect to the managerled firms, expenditures on R&D depend on the control exerted. If capital shares are widely dispersed and managers are thus only controlled a little by owners, they invest more into R&D. Owner-led firms and managers who are strongly controlled have a very similar R&D intensity.
O31, O32, Tobit Regression, 330, ddc:330, Eigentümerstruktur, Investition, Industrielle Forschung, Innovative Activity, Corporate Governance, Incentives, C24, Innovative Activity,Managerial versus Owner-led Firms,Incentives,Tobit Regression, Innovation, Deutschland, Managerial versus Owner-led Firms, D21, Schätzung, jel: jel:C24, jel: jel:D21, jel: jel:O31, jel: jel:O32
O31, O32, Tobit Regression, 330, ddc:330, Eigentümerstruktur, Investition, Industrielle Forschung, Innovative Activity, Corporate Governance, Incentives, C24, Innovative Activity,Managerial versus Owner-led Firms,Incentives,Tobit Regression, Innovation, Deutschland, Managerial versus Owner-led Firms, D21, Schätzung, jel: jel:C24, jel: jel:D21, jel: jel:O31, jel: jel:O32
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
