Name: Slow Archaeology, Punk Archaeology, and the ‘Archaeology of Care’
Creator: William Caraher
Keywords: Archaeology, Archaeology--Data processing, 0601 history and archaeology, 06 humanities and the arts

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 05 Apr 2019 English Publisher:Cambridge University Press (CUP)Journal:European Journal of Archaeology, volume 22, pages 372-385 (issn: 1461-9571, eissn: 1741-2722,

Authors: William Caraher;

doi: 10.1017/eaa.2019.15 , 10.17613/686y-gk69 , 10.17613/6dvmg-4z610

Slow Archaeology, Punk Archaeology, and the ‘Archaeology of Care’

- Summary
- Subjects
- Metrics

Abstract

This article considers the impact of both historical and digital transhuman practices in archaeology with an eye towards recent conversations concerning punk archaeology, slow archaeology, and an ‘archaeology of care’. Drawing on Ivan Illich, Jacques Ellul, and Gilles Deleuze, the article suggests that current trends in digital practices risk alienating archaeological labour and de-territorializing archaeological work.

Related Organizations

University of South Dakota
United States

Keywords

Archaeology, Archaeology--Data processing

Impact byBIP!

	citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	37
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Top 10%
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Top 10%