<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
In light of the variation found in environmental law scholarship and in light of the lack of commitment to a specific methodology among environmental law scholars, this chapter argues that environmental law scholarship is best conceptualised as a scholarly practice. A scholarly practice which is shaped by the legal culture of environmental law in which it operates. The chapter identifies a scholarly practice as a social endeavor in which the scholars taking part in the practice maintain a level of commitment to the maintenance of the practice. The commitment to the practice takes the form of the adherence to the un-written but mutually agreed set of understandings and ground rules. In environmental law scholarship such mutually agreed ground rules necessarily result in a practice which accommodates a wide range of perspectives on scholarship.
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |