Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Immunoprecipitation of chromatin

Authors: Bryan M. Turner; Laura P. O'Neill;

Immunoprecipitation of chromatin

Abstract

Publisher Summary This chapter discusses the immunoprecipitation of chromatin. The chapter discusses three standard protocols, all of which are used to analyze the role of specific proteins within defined regions of the eukaryotic genome. It analyzes both the DNA and the protein after immunoprecipitation. This requires a careful examination of the protocol chosen as not all are amenable to protein analysis. The conformation of protein antigens is likely to vary depending on whether they are in their native state in solution, formaldehyde-fixed, bound to nitrocellulose filters, or fixed to plastic microtiter plates. Nonspecific binding of the antibody to chromatin should also be carefully controlled. Antibodies may be added in excess if complete depletion of the target protein is required. Affinity purification of antisera also minimizes background and, if possible, should be routinely carried out. Some studies requiring the precise positioning of DNA-binding proteins are hampered by the exchange, sliding, or artificial movements of proteins during chromatin isolation. Treatment with formaldehyde dimethyl sulfate/borohydride or UV irradiation efficiently cross-links proteins to DNA. Methods for formaldehyde cross-linking of chromatin in nuclei is described in detail.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Radioisotope Dilution Technique, Ultraviolet Rays, Lysine, Sepharose, DNA, Tritium, Precipitin Tests, Chromatin, Chromatography, Affinity, DNA-Binding Proteins, Cross-Linking Reagents, Animals, Indicators and Reagents, Carbon Radioisotopes, Thymidine

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    64
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
64
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?