
Throughout history, agriculture-led development strategies with state support programs have been essential to achieving rapid economy-wide growth, poverty reduction, and structural transformation. Yet over the last three decades, the domestic and international policy environments have continued to discriminate against agricultural development in the poorest countries. This paper studies the causes and manifestations Of this "urban bias," including discrimination in domestic pricing policies and in the international trade regime. decreasing financial support from LDC governments and aid donors, and increasing neglect of agriculture in development theory and economic research. The authors conclude that urban bias remains a persistent and paramount obstacle to sustained growth and poverty reduction in the least developed countries. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH, ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT, RURAL INDIA, agricultural policies, foreign aid, INCOME DIVERSIFICATION, LATIN-AMERICA, urban bias, POVERTY, agricultural development, urban bias, agricultural policies, foreign aid, agricultural development, WORLD, PRO-POOR, DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES, SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA, jel: jel:O13, jel: jel:Q18
PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH, ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT, RURAL INDIA, agricultural policies, foreign aid, INCOME DIVERSIFICATION, LATIN-AMERICA, urban bias, POVERTY, agricultural development, urban bias, agricultural policies, foreign aid, agricultural development, WORLD, PRO-POOR, DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES, SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA, jel: jel:O13, jel: jel:Q18
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 198 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
