
pmid: 26701706
To design robust protected area networks, accurately measure species losses, or understand the processes that maintain species diversity, conservation science must consider the organization of biodiversity in space. Central is beta-diversity--the component of regional diversity that accumulates from compositional differences between local species assemblages. We review how beta-diversity is impacted by human activities, including farming, selective logging, urbanization, species invasions, overhunting, and climate change. Beta-diversity increases, decreases, or remains unchanged by these impacts, depending on the balance of processes that cause species composition to become more different (biotic heterogenization) or more similar (biotic homogenization) between sites. While maintaining high beta-diversity is not always a desirable conservation outcome, understanding beta-diversity is essential for protecting regional diversity and can directly assist conservation planning.
pairwise dissimilarities, gamma-diversity, Conservation of Natural Resources, Spatial Analysis, beta-diversity, Climate Change, Urbanization, Agriculture, Forestry, species-area relationships, Biodiversity, biotic homogenization, diversity partitioning, biodiversity conservation, spatial scaling, Introduced Species, alpha-diversity
pairwise dissimilarities, gamma-diversity, Conservation of Natural Resources, Spatial Analysis, beta-diversity, Climate Change, Urbanization, Agriculture, Forestry, species-area relationships, Biodiversity, biotic homogenization, diversity partitioning, biodiversity conservation, spatial scaling, Introduced Species, alpha-diversity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1K | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.01% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
