
pmid: 15713325
Because of the inherent discreteness of individuals, population dynamical models must be discrete variable systems. In case of strong nonlinearity, such systems interacting with noise can generate a great variety of patterns from nearly periodic behavior through complex combination of nearly periodic and chaotic patterns to noisy chaotic time series. The interaction of a population consisting of discrete individuals and demographic noise has been analyzed in laboratory population data Henson et al. (Science 294 (2001) 602; Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B 270 (2003) 1549). In this paper we point out that some of the cycles are fragile, i.e. they are sensitive to the discretization algorithm and to small variation of the model parameters, while others remain "sturdy" against the perturbations. We introduce a statistical algorithm to detect disjoint, nearly-periodic patterns in data series. We show that only the sturdy cycles of the discrete variable models appear in the data series significantly. Our analysis identified the quasiperiodic 11-cycle (emerging in the continuous model) to be present significantly only in one of the three experimental data series. Numerical simulations confirm that cycles can be detected only if noise is smaller than a certain critical level and population dynamics display the largest variety of nearly-periodic patterns if they are on the border of "grey" and "noisy" regions, defined in Domokos and Scheuring (J. Theor. Biol. 227 (2004) 535).
Tribolium, Ecology, chaos, Models, Theoretical, Dynamical systems in biology, Population dynamics (general), Nonlinear Dynamics, intermittently periodic patterns, Animals, discrete variables models, time series, Algorithms
Tribolium, Ecology, chaos, Models, Theoretical, Dynamical systems in biology, Population dynamics (general), Nonlinear Dynamics, intermittently periodic patterns, Animals, discrete variables models, time series, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
