
The paper investigates three algorithms for learning an unknown regular set of infinite words using membership and equivalence queries. These algorithms use different canonical representations of regular \(\omega\)-languages. The representations are based on families of deterministic finite automata (dfa) accepting sets of infinite words: 1. a dfa representation used by \textit{A. Farzan} et al. [Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 4963, 2--17 (2008; Zbl 1134.68406)] which is based on the \(L_{\$}\)-representation introduced by \textit{H. Calbrix} et al. [C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Sér. I 318, No. 5, 493--497 (1994; Zbl 0917.20053)]; 2. the syntactic FORC, introduced by \textit{O. Maler} and \textit{L. Staiger} [Theor. Comput. Sci. 183, No. 1, 93--112 (1997; Zbl 0911.68145)]; and 3. a new representation. It is shown that the second and third can be exponentially smaller than the first, and the third is at most as large as the second.
language inference, membership queries, Computational learning theory, Formal languages and automata, infinitary languages, equivalence queries, active learning, Büchi automaton
language inference, membership queries, Computational learning theory, Formal languages and automata, infinitary languages, equivalence queries, active learning, Büchi automaton
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 35 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
