Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Spatial Statisticsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Spatial Statistics
Article . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Effects of different sampling densities on geographically weighted regression kriging for predicting soil organic carbon

Authors: Huichun Ye; Wenjiang Huang; Shanyu Huang; Yuanfang Huang; Shiwen Zhang; Yingying Dong; Pengfei Chen;

Effects of different sampling densities on geographically weighted regression kriging for predicting soil organic carbon

Abstract

Abstract Geographically weighted regression kriging (GWRK) is a popular interpolation method, considering not only spatial parametric non-stationarity and relationship between target and explanatory variables, but also spatial autocorrelation of residuals. However, little attention has been paid to the effects of different sampling densities on GWRK technique for estimating soil properties. Objectives of this study were: (i) comparing the GWRK predictions with those obtained from multiple linear regression kriging (MLRK) and ordinary kriging (OK), and (ii) examining how different sampling densities affect the performance of GWRK for predicting soil organic carbon (SOC). Soil samples were simulated with four sampling densities, including 0.010, 0.020, 0.041, and 0.082 sites/km 2 . The results showed that GWRK made less prediction errors and outperformed MLRK and OK in the case of a high sampling density, with the root mean squared errors of GWRK MLRK>OK. However, in the case of a low sampling density, GWRK generated larger prediction errors, exhibiting a poorer performance than MLRK and OK. Accordingly, we conclude that GWRK can be considered as the best approach for predicting SOC in these three approaches with sufficient data points, but it has a poorer performance than the other methods with sparse data points.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    47
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
47
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!