
The degree of segregation between two or more sub-populations has been studied since the 1950s, and examples include segregation along racial and religious lines. The Dissimilarity index is a commonly used measure to numerically quantify segregation, using population level data for a set of areal units that comprise a city or country. However, the construction of this index usually ignores the spatial autocorrelation present in the data, and it is also typically presented without a measure of uncertainty. Therefore we propose a Bayesian hierarchical modelling approach for estimating the Dissimilarity index and quantifying its uncertainty, which utilises a conditional autoregressive model to account for the spatial autocorrelation in the data. This modelling approach is motivated by a study of religious segregation in Northern Ireland, and allows us to quantify whether the dissimilarity index has exhibited a substantial change between 2001 and 2011.
Conditional autoregressive models, Dissimilarity index, Bayesian hierarchical modelling, Spatial autocorrelation
Conditional autoregressive models, Dissimilarity index, Bayesian hierarchical modelling, Spatial autocorrelation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
