Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Investigoarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Investigo
Article . 2020
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Investigo
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The Science of The Total Environment
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Changes in invertebrate community composition allow for consistent interpretation of biodiversity loss in ecological status assessment

Authors: Isabel Pardo; Noemí Costas; Leire Méndez-Fernández; Maite Martínez-Madrid; Pilar Rodríguez;

Changes in invertebrate community composition allow for consistent interpretation of biodiversity loss in ecological status assessment

Abstract

Biological communities change in response to human alteration. The response of individual taxa and the community can be used to establish preventive criteria to halt further biodiversity deterioration. Here we explore how consistent are the boundaries between Good and Moderate ecological status derived from classification systems used in North-NW Spain: NORThern Spain Indicators system (NORTI), River type specific multimetric (METI) and Iberian Bio-monitoring Working Party (IBMWP), by using common interpretation of normative definitions of Water Framework Directive. We applied the three classifications to a monitoring dataset of Nalón River basin, comprising samples from different stream types and reference conditions. We applied Threshold Indicator Taxa ANalysis to the invertebrate community along the most relevant environmental pressures and biological impairment gradients represented by the Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR) scores of the classification systems. Only NORTI provided a true community ecological threshold and the change point (cp) 95% quantile (Q95%) range of 0.760 was assumed to be the boundary from Good to Moderate (G/M) status, used to standardize the number of taxa loss in all systems. Since the average number of taxa at reference sites was 34, the estimated loss of sensitive taxa was up to 97.1% in IBMWP, 73.5% in METI and 52.9% in NORTI when passing from Good to Moderate status, revealing very permissive boundaries. The loss of common sensitive taxa in NORTI at Q95% was used as G/M threshold and applied to the other classifications, resulting all in a common biodiversity loss of 21% of sensitive taxa richness at values of NORTI-EQR = 0.760, METI-EQR = 0.818 and IBMWP-EQR = 0.753. Results indicate that significant community changes along pressure gradients allow for establishing quantitative criteria consistent with normative definitions. This understanding derived from Directive monitoring programs can assess the risk that invertebrate communities face in terms of species loss derived from anthropogenic pressures.

Country
Spain
Keywords

24 Ciencias de la Vida, Biodiversity, Invertebrates, Rivers, Spain, Animals, Environmental Monitoring

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%