Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Scientia Horticultur...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Scientia Horticulturae
Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Identification of QTLs for storage root yield in sweetpotato

Authors: Hui Li; Ning Zhao; Xiaoxia Yu; Yanxia Liu; Hong Zhai; Shaozhen He; Qiang Li; +2 Authors

Identification of QTLs for storage root yield in sweetpotato

Abstract

Sweetpotato breeding is challenging due to its genetic complexity, and marker-assisted breeding tools are needed to facilitate the improvement of this crop. In the present study, we identified quantitative trait loci (QTL) for storage root yield of sweetpotato using a mapping population consisting of 202 individuals derived from a cross between Xushu18 (a high yield cultivar) and Xu781 (a low yield line). Two parental linkage maps based on AFLP and SSR markers were constructed using this mapping population. Interval mapping (IM) was performed first and, subsequently, a multiple QTL model (MQM) was used to refine the position and magnitude of the QTL. A total of nine major QTLs for storage root yield were mapped, explaining 17.7–59.3% of the variation. These 9 QTLs, YIEF_1, YIEF_2, YIEF_3, YIEF_4, YIEM_1, YIEM_2, YIEM_3, YIEM_4 and YIEM_5, were co-localized to markers E24M1-17d, E53M30-12d, C27_8s**, E63M3-10d, E50M49-4d, IB_S10_9d, E54M5-4d, E21M8-23d and IB_S10_4d, respectively.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    20
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
20
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
hybrid