
AbstractCourse achievement evaluation is very important because it will determine students’ level of understanding with regards to the course. Each course offered at UniversitiKebangsaan Malaysia has its own pre-determined Learning Outcomes (LOs) which were published to students at the start of the semester. These LOs were evaluated at the end of the semester end in process to determine LO's achievement by the students. Current learning evaluation consists of analyzing students’ grades accumulated from the final exam marks, assignments, projects, class participation and others. However, this evaluation does not realistically represent the students’ understanding of the course. Therefore, an evaluation based on Difficulty Index (DI) approach is proposed as an accompanying method to evaluate the LOs’ achievements. DI can be used as an indicator to identify the level of difficulty for each question or task assigned to students. DI values were measured for the objective and subjective types of final examination's questions and also any assignments and group projects completed by the students. These items also contribute towards the final evaluation for each student. DI values were mapped to the LOs and also the BLOOM taxonomy classification as stated in the course syllabus. The mapping reveals the relationship between the evaluation items and the students’ achievement of the LOs. The case study usesdata for the Management Information System (MIS) course which is offered to second year undergraduates at the Faculty of Information Science and Technology. The result revealed the role DI for this course as a possible transformation agent that is able to improve the course contents and delivery. DI also shows the relationship between the student achievement and the LOs. Hence, modification for future assessment methods can be proposed based on the DI values for the current assessment.
difficulty index, course outcome, Course evaluation
difficulty index, course outcome, Course evaluation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
