
AbstractThis paper presents results from the pilot project on teacher assessment of the Regional University of Blumenau. It contains discussions about the project was elaborated by the team of internal assessments of the university, discussing the dimensions, issues and quantitative analysis techniques and the construction of the FURB Professoŕs Quality Index (IFQD). The multi-criteria tools used were the consensus theory, information entropy and the TOPSIS multi-criteria decision analysis method. Two undergraduate courses were assessed totaling 56 professors were evaluated by a group of 1979 students.
Consensus, Entropy., Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, Professor evaluation, TOPSIS
Consensus, Entropy., Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, Professor evaluation, TOPSIS
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
