
Abstract A recent numerical study of turbulence–flame interactions in lean premixed hydrogen, where the Lewis number was approximately 0.36, observed that flames at different equivalence ratios presented significantly different behavior despite having the same Karlovitz and Damkohler numbers. This differing behavior is due to the thermodiffusively-unstable nature of low Lewis number flames. In more than one dimension, differential diffusion focuses fuel into hot regions increasing the local burning rate, which was found to affect the leaner hydrogen flames more significantly. Ultimately, this difference between idealized flat flames and freely-propagating flames undermines the characterization of turbulent flames through Karlovitz and Damkohler numbers based on flat laminar quantities. This paper considers refining the definitions of these dimensionless numbers by replacing the flat laminar flame values with freely-propagating values. In particular, we perform three-dimensional simulations of freely-propagating flames over a range of equivalence ratios, and use data from those simulations to define modified Karlovitz and Damkolher numbers. This provides a framework to classify low Lewis number turbulent flames in the context of the premixed combustion regime diagram that eliminates anomalies with the traditional definitions for low Lewis number flames. We then perform a series of turbulent flame simulations that show that our new definitions effectively eliminate the dependence on fuel equivalence ratio.
/dk/atira/pure/core/subjects/cosmology, Cosmology and Gravitation, Mechanical and Design Engineering, /dk/atira/pure/core/subjects/mech, 532
/dk/atira/pure/core/subjects/cosmology, Cosmology and Gravitation, Mechanical and Design Engineering, /dk/atira/pure/core/subjects/mech, 532
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 78 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
