
The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is set to rise in physiotherapy. PROMs provide additional 'patient-centred' data which is unique in capturing the patient's own opinion on the impact of their disease or disorder, and its treatment, on their life. Thus, PROMs are increasingly used by clinicians to guide routine patient care, or for the purposes of audit, and are already firmly embedded in clinical research. This article seeks to summarise the key aspects of PROM use for physiotherapists, both in routine clinical practice and in the research setting, and highlights recent developments in the field. Generic and condition-specific PROMs are defined and examples of commonly used measures are provided. The selection of appropriate PROMs, and their effective use in the clinical and research settings is discussed. Finally, existing barriers to PROM use in practice are identified and recent physiotherapy PROM initiatives, led by the Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy are explored.
Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Patient-reported outcomes, Physiotherapy research, Health Status, Reproducibility of Results, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Clinical practice, United Kingdom, Patient Outcome Assessment, PROMs, Benchmarking, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Satisfaction, Research Design, Patient-reported outcome measures, Quality of Life, Humans, Self Report, Physiotherapy, Physical Therapy Modalities
Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Patient-reported outcomes, Physiotherapy research, Health Status, Reproducibility of Results, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Clinical practice, United Kingdom, Patient Outcome Assessment, PROMs, Benchmarking, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Satisfaction, Research Design, Patient-reported outcome measures, Quality of Life, Humans, Self Report, Physiotherapy, Physical Therapy Modalities
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 179 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
