
arXiv: 1601.07108
Understanding the network structure, and finding out the influential nodes is a challenging issue in the large networks. Identifying the most influential nodes in the network can be useful in many applications like immunization of nodes in case of epidemic spreading, during intentional attacks on complex networks. A lot of research is done to devise centrality measures which could efficiently identify the most influential nodes in the network. There are two major approaches to the problem: On one hand, deterministic strategies that exploit knowledge about the overall network topology in order to find the influential nodes, while on the other end, random strategies are completely agnostic about the network structure. Centrality measures that can deal with a limited knowledge of the network structure are required. Indeed, in practice, information about the global structure of the overall network is rarely available or hard to acquire. Even if available, the structure of the network might be too large that it is too much computationally expensive to calculate global centrality measures. To that end, a centrality measure is proposed that requires information only at the community level to identify the influential nodes in the network. Indeed, most of the real-world networks exhibit a community structure that can be exploited efficiently to discover the influential nodes. We performed a comparative evaluation of prominent global deterministic strategies together with stochastic strategies with an available and the proposed deterministic community-based strategy. Effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated by performing experiments on synthetic and real-world networks with community structure in the case of immunization of nodes for epidemic control.
30 pages, 4 figures. Accepted for publication in Physica A. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1411.6276
Social and Information Networks (cs.SI), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Physics - Physics and Society, Complex networks, FOS: Physical sciences, Computer Science - Social and Information Networks, Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph), Epidemic dynamics, Immunization strategies, Community structure, [PHYS.PHYS] Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]
Social and Information Networks (cs.SI), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Physics - Physics and Society, Complex networks, FOS: Physical sciences, Computer Science - Social and Information Networks, Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph), Epidemic dynamics, Immunization strategies, Community structure, [PHYS.PHYS] Physics [physics]/Physics [physics]
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 92 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
