
pmid: 31519462
Abstract Objectives Pediatrician-adolescent communication can improve adolescent health. We conducted a two-arm design to pilot-test an intervention that randomized adolescents to receive a Feedback Guide to promote engaged conversations. We hypothesized that adolescents who received the Guide would be more participatory. Methods We recruited 12 pediatricians and 29 adolescents. Clinic staff enrolled adolescents using a tablet that enabled consenting, assessment of high-risk behaviors , and audio recording of encounters. We surveyed adolescents immediately and two months after the encounter. Results Adolescents who received the intervention were more participatory than adolescents who did not. Pediatricians counseled on 20 of 32 high-risk behaviors with no significant arm differences . At follow-up, adolescents changed 9 of 32 behaviors; 6 were among 4 of adolescents in the intervention arm. Adolescents in the intervention arm were also more likely to report that counseling would help them change their behavior; these encounters were slightly longer than control arm encounters. Conclusions We confirmed feasibility of a streamlined approach to enrolling and audio recording encounters. The Feedback Guide improved adolescent participation and might have helped them adopt healthier behaviors. Practice Implications Adolescents can be primed to be participatory and can change their behaviors after a meaningful encounter with their pediatrician.
Social Skills, Communication, Teaching, Humans, Mentoring, Clinical Competence
Social Skills, Communication, Teaching, Humans, Mentoring, Clinical Competence
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
