
pmid: 21570796
To evaluate the effect our developmental-behavioral pediatrics (DBP) curricular model had on residents' comfort with handling mental health issues.From August 2007 to January 2010, residents participating in the Indiana University DBP rotation completed a self-assessment questionnaire at baseline and at rotation end. Residents rated their comfort with the identification, treatment, and counseling of mental health problems using a 5-point scale.Ninety-four residents completed both self-assessments. At baseline, categorical pediatric residents possessed higher comfort levels toward identification (mean 2.8 vs. 2.3 for non-categorical pediatrics residents, p<0.05), treatment (2.6 vs. 2.2, p<0.05) and counseling of mental health issues (2.7 vs. 2.1, p<0.005). Residents who were parents were also more comfortable. At rotation end, all residents showed significant improvements in self-rated comfort (4.0 vs. 2.6 for identification, p≤0.05; 4.0 vs. 2.4 for treatment, p≤0.05; and 4.0 vs. 2.4 for counseling, p≤0.05). This remained true regardless of being a categorical pediatric resident, a parent, or primary care-oriented.Our curricular model promotes residents' comfort with handling common mental health issues in practice.Increasing residents' comfort may influence the frequency of active discussion of mental health issues during well-child visits and lead to earlier diagnosis and needed treatment.
Adult, Male, Indiana, Attitude of Health Personnel, Internship and Residency, Pediatrics, Mental Health, Education, Medical, Graduate, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Mental Competency, Clinical Competence, Curriculum
Adult, Male, Indiana, Attitude of Health Personnel, Internship and Residency, Pediatrics, Mental Health, Education, Medical, Graduate, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Mental Competency, Clinical Competence, Curriculum
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
