Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Otolaryngologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Otolaryngology
Article . 2007 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Otolaryngology
Article . 2007
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Bilateral versus unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Authors: Jeong-Hoon, Oh; Keehyun, Park; Seung Joo, Lee; You Ree, Shin; Yun-Hoon, Choung;

Bilateral versus unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Abstract

OBJECTIVESTo analyze the clinical characteristics and treatment results between bilateral (bi‐) and unilateral (uni‐) sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL).STUDY DESIGN AND SETTINGA retrospective study.METHODSThree hundred twenty‐four patients with SSNHL were classified into two groups; simultaneous bi‐SSNHL (n = 16) and uni‐SSNHL (n = 308). We compared clinical characteristics, medical history, hearing level, and treatment results between the 2 groups.RESULTSThe incidence of bi‐SSNHL was 4.9 percent of overall patients with SSNHL. Bi‐SSNHL occurs more commonly in patients of older age, with preexisting diabetes mellitus, and lipid panel abnormalities compared with uni‐SSNHL. Ten patients (62.5%) in the bi‐SSNHL group showed hearing recovery in 1 or both ears compared with 56.5 percent of patients with uni‐SSNHL. Only 12 (37.5%) of all 32 ears recovered in bi‐SSNHL, which was significantly lower than in uni‐SSNHL.CONCLUSIONBi‐SSNHL has a very low incidence and lower recovery rate than uni‐SSNHL. Recognition of similarities and differences between bilateral and unilateral SSNHL can help in counseling and managing the patients.© 2007 American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. All rights reserved.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Incidence, Comorbidity, Recovery of Function, Middle Aged, Hearing, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Female, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    101
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
101
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!