
pmid: 16890084
ObjectiveTo evaluate the applicability of vestibular‐evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) in the diagnostics, intraoperative monitoring, and postoperative follow‐up of patients in otoneurosurgery.Study DesignA prospective study of patients who underwent either cochlear implantation (CI, n = 18) or were diagnosed with an acoustic neuroma (AN, n = 9) or with neuro(micro)vascular compression of the VIIIth nerve (NVC, n = 27) in the period 2002 to 2004. The follow‐up was 1 year for all patients.SettingA tertiary‐referral unit.ResultsVEMPs could be recorded in 64% of all patients before CI and in 22% after surgery. The patients with AN had normal VEMPs in 22% of all cases when first diagnosed. Normal VEMPs were found in 37% of those patients with NVC. From the 5 AN patients who had to be operated, only 1 had intact VEMPs after surgery. In contrast, after microvascular decompression all patients (4) had normal VEMPs.ConclusionsVEMPs are helpful in diagnosing patients with vertigo to better identify saccular defects. They are highly sensitive in the early diagnosis of retrocochlear lesions.SignificanceVEMPs can help to reliably identify patients with a retrocochlerar lesion at an early stage and can be used in intraoperative, neurophysiological monitoring.EBM rating: C‐4
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Neuroma, Acoustic, Middle Aged, Cochlear Implantation, Electric Stimulation, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Vertigo, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Retrocochlear Diseases, Vestibule, Labyrinth
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Neuroma, Acoustic, Middle Aged, Cochlear Implantation, Electric Stimulation, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Vertigo, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Retrocochlear Diseases, Vestibule, Labyrinth
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
