Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Nutritionarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Nutrition
Article . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Estimated height from knee height or ulna length and self-reported height are no substitute for actual height in inpatients

Authors: Flávia Moraes, Silva; Luciane, Figueira;

Estimated height from knee height or ulna length and self-reported height are no substitute for actual height in inpatients

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the precision of estimated height from ulna length (UL) using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) equation and compare it with predicted height from knee height (KH), and self-reported height in estimating actual body height in inpatients.This cross-sectional study was carried out with patients admitted to an emergency service of a tertiary public hospital. Data were collected, at the patients' bedsides, from a specific questionnaire and anthropometric measurements. Height was estimated from UL and KH, and compared with self-reported and actual height. The Bland-Altman methods were used to evaluate agreement between measures.This study included 427 inpatients (52.6% women, ages 54.30 ± 15.39 y). A significant difference was found when actual height (161.07 ± 8.77 cm) was compared with estimated height from KH (163.64 ± 8.61 cm) and self-reported height (164.54 ± 8.95 cm). A not significant difference of 1.07 cm was observed between actual height and estimated height from UL (160.74 ± 7.48 cm); however, the limits of agreement between measures were large (from 13.69 to 14.39 cm). The difference observed between actual and self-reported height was higher in men (-8.50 [-17.00; -2.00] cm) than in women (1.00 [-6.00; 8.00] cm), whereas the difference between actual height and estimated height from KH and UL did not differ statistically between men and women.Estimated height from UL (MUST equation), self-reported height and estimated height from KH led to errors in predicting actual height of inpatients.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Anthropometry, Reproducibility of Results, Ulna, Mathematical Concepts, Middle Aged, Body Height, Hospitalization, Cross-Sectional Studies, Sex Factors, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Knee, Self Report, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!