
arXiv: 1902.10467
A common issue of deep neural networks-based methods for the problem of Single Image Super-Resolution (SISR), is the recovery of finer texture details when super-resolving at large upscaling factors. This issue is particularly related to the choice of the objective loss function. In particular, recent works proposed the use of a VGG loss which consists in minimizing the error between the generated high resolution images and ground-truth in the feature space of a Convolutional Neural Network (VGG19), pre-trained on the very "large" ImageNet dataset. When considering the problem of super-resolving images with a distribution "far" from the ImageNet images distribution (\textit{e.g.,} satellite images), their proposed \textit{fixed} VGG loss is no longer relevant. In this paper, we present a general framework named \textit{Generative Collaborative Networks} (GCN), where the idea consists in optimizing the \textit{generator} (the mapping of interest) in the feature space of a \textit{features extractor} network. The two networks (generator and extractor) are \textit{collaborative} in the sense that the latter "helps" the former, by constructing discriminative and relevant features (not necessarily \textit{fixed} and possibly learned \textit{mutually} with the generator). We evaluate the GCN framework in the context of SISR, and we show that it results in a method that is adapted to super-resolution domains that are "far" from the ImageNet domain.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, [INFO] Computer Science [cs]
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, [INFO] Computer Science [cs]
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
